Friday, August 27, 2010

JEREMIAH

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart



be acceptable in your sight,


O LORD, my rock and my redeemer.

--The Holy Bible, English Standard Version Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved

JEREMIAH

Most impressive of all ... is the way in which Jesus Christ was associated in the popular mind with Jeremiah. When on one occasion Christ took a sampling of public opinion from His disciples (Matt. 16:13f.), some reports identified Him with the outstanding prophetic figure of the seventh century B.C. It is hardly surprising that some mistook the Man of sorrows for the prophet of the broken heart, for Jeremiah and Christ both lamented and wept over their contemporaries (cf. 9:1 and Luke 19:41).”
                                                                                                                                  —R. K. Harrison

Jeremiah is best known as “the weeping prophet.” This is the key to his writings, for if we remember this and the reason for his weeping, we shall be able to understand his message.

This prophet is unique in that he reveals his heart and personality more than any other OT prophet. 1 By nature he was sensitive and retiring, yet he was divinely called to severely denounce the apostasy of his day. International tension between Babylon, Egypt, and Assyria for world supremacy, severe spiritual decline in Israel after Judah’s last revival under Josiah, as well as people who had been raised on God’s Word and true religion turning to pagan cults, all remind us of Western Christendom today.
-MacDonald, William ; Farstad, Arthur: Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995, S. Je 1:1

Dr, J. Vernon McGee in his introduction to Jeremiah indicates: Jeremiah, the prophet of the broken heart, is the writer of this book. It is one of the most remarkable books in the Bible. Every book in the Bible is remarkable, but this book is remarkable in a very unusual way. Most of the prophets hide themselves and maintain a character of anonymity. They do not project themselves on the pages of their prophecy. But Jeremiah is a prophet whose prophecy is largely autobiographical.

McGee, J. Vernon: Thru the Bible Commentary: The Prophets (Jeremiah/Lamentations). electronic ed. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1991 (Thru the Bible Commentary 24),

ISAIAH

“Isaiah ... is the greatest of the Hebrew prophets and orators. For splendor of diction, brilliance of imagery, versatility and beauty of style, he is unequalled. Correctly he has been called the ‘Prince of Old Testament Prophets.’“
                                                                                                                        —Merrill F. Unger

MacDonald, William ; Farstad, Arthur: Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995, S. Is 1:1

In The Disciple’s Study Bible we are told:

The Book of Isaiah presents an exciting challenge to the reader both by its size and its content. The book’s riches open only to those diligent and persistent. Little is known of the origin of the book. The content falls easily into two distinct divisions: 1-39 historically set in the eighth century B.C., and 40-66 historically set in the sixth century B.C.. Such a striking and unusual phenomenon within one book has caused serious students of the Bible to reach differing conclusions as to exactly what happened. Did God reveal to Isaiah truth for his own day (eighth century) and truth relevant two hundred years in the future (sixth century)? Were there perhaps two prophets involved in bringing this truth to us, Isaiah and a nameless one who lived and ministered two hundred years later? Each one who takes up the Book of Isaiah should remember: (1) that such a difference in time does exist between the two parts; (2) that scholars will forever be divided on how to explain this difference; and (3) that the question is not a question of what God could or could not do. Either position fits comfortably within the belief that God is all powerful. More important than the explanation accepted is the realization that these two parts of the book are not contradictory but complementary. Together they reveal the total message of the inspired book.

__Disciple’s Study Bible Copyright © 1988 Holman Bible Publishers, Nashville, TN. All rights reserved.

Dr. John MacArthur indicates:
The book derives its title from the author, whose name means “The LORD is salvation,” and is similar to the names Joshua, Elisha, and Jesus. Isaiah is quoted directly in the NT over sixty-five times, far more than any other OT prophet, and mentioned by name over twenty times.

Isaiah, the son of Amoz, ministered in and around Jerusalem as a prophet to Judah during the reigns of four kings of Judah: Uzziah (called “Azariah” in 2 Kin.), Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (1:1), from ca. 739–686 B.C. Isaiah evidently came from a family of some rank, because he had easy access to the king (7:3) and intimacy with a priest (8:2). He was married and had two sons who bore symbolic names: “Shear-jashub” (“a remnant shall return,” 7:3) and “Maher-shalal-hash-baz” (“hasting to the spoil, hurrying to the prey,” 8:3). When called by God to prophesy, in the year of King Uzziah’s death (ca. 739 B.C.), he responded with a cheerful readiness, though he knew from the beginning that his ministry would be one of fruitless warning and exhortation (6:9–13). Having been reared in Jerusalem, he was an appropriate choice as a political and religious counselor to the nation.

Isaiah was a contemporary of Hosea and Micah. His writing style has no rival in its versatility of expression, brilliance of imagery, and richness of vocabulary. The early church father Jerome likened him to Demosthenes, the legendary Greek orator. His writing features a range of 2,186 different words, compared to 1,535 in Ezekiel, 1,653 in Jeremiah, and 2,170 in the Psalms. Second Chronicles 32:32 records that he wrote a biography of King Hezekiah also. The prophet lived until at least 681 B.C. when he penned the account of Sennacherib’s death (cf. 37:38). Tradition has it that he met his death under King Manasseh (ca. 695–642 B.C.) by being cut in two with a wooden saw (cf. Heb. 11:37).

THE BOOK OF ISAIAH presents one of the most startling examples of messianic prophecy in the OT. With vivid imagery, Isaiah depicts the future Christ as the Suffering Servant, who was “led as a lamb to the slaughter” (53:7) and “shall justify many, for He shall bear their iniquities” (53:11).
MacArthur, John: The MacArthur Bible Handbook. Nashville, Tenn. : Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2003, S. 183

So now we undertake one of our most challenging and yet one of the most rewarding of our endeavors. “Who has given credence to what we have heard? And who has seen in it a revelation of Yahweh’s arm? 2 Like a sapling he grew up before him, like a root in arid ground. He had no form or charm to attract us, no beauty to win our hearts; 3 he was despised, the lowest of men, a man of sorrows, familiar with suffering, one from whom, as it were, we averted our gaze, despised, for whom we had no regard. 4 Yet ours were the sufferings he was bearing, ours the sorrows he was carrying, while we thought of him as someone being punished and struck with affliction by God; 5 whereas he was being wounded for our rebellions, crushed because of our guilt; the punishment reconciling us fell on him, and we have been healed by his bruises. 6 We had all gone astray like sheep, each taking his own way, and Yahweh brought the acts of rebellion of all of us to bear on him. 7 Ill-treated and afflicted, he never opened his mouth, like a lamb led to the slaughter-house, like a sheep dumb before its shearers he never opened his mouth. 8 Forcibly, after sentence, he was taken. Which of his contemporaries was concerned at his having been cut off from the land of the living, at his having been struck dead for his people’s rebellion? 9 He was given a grave with the wicked, and his tomb is with the rich, although he had done no violence, had spoken no deceit. 10 It was Yahweh’s good pleasure to crush him with pain; if he gives his life as a sin offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his life, and through him Yahweh’s good pleasure will be done. 11 After the ordeal he has endured, he will see the light and be content. By his knowledge, the upright one, my servant will justify many by taking their guilt on himself. 12 Hence I shall give him a portion with the many, and he will share the booty with the mighty, for having exposed himself to death and for being counted as one of the rebellious, whereas he was bearing the sin of many and interceding for the rebellious. “

The New Jerusalem Bible. New York : Doubleday, 1985, S. Ge 1:1-3

SONG OF SOLOMON

“In the glorious temple of revelation, a place which the Lord our God has chosen to cause his name to dwell there, even in brighter glory than in the temple of the material world, does this book stand, like one of the apartments in the temple on Mount Zion, small indeed, but exquisitely finished, the walls and ceiling of something richer than cedar, richer than bright ivory overlaid with sapphires, and filled with specimens of truth brought down from heaven by the Holy Spirit, and here deposited for the comfort and delight of those who love the habitation of God’s house, and the place where his glory dwelleth.”

—George Burrowes

MacDonald, W., & Farstad, A. (1997, c1995). Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments (So 1:2). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.


The Disciples Study Bible offers the following introduction:

Love—how does the believer express love to another human being? That is the issue in the Song of Songs.
The issue was real for God’s people when these love songs were written and sung for them. Relationships between the sexes were not simply a private matter for Israel. The worship services of their neighbors involved sexual relationships between the worshiper and a member of the staff of the high places where worship was held. We refer to such practices as cultic prostitution and the staff members of the high places as cultic prostitutes.

The Baal religion of Canaan taught that this use of sexual relationships in the worship of Baal guaranteed rain, good crops, and fertility for human parents. Those who refused to participate in such worship faced outrage from their neighbors when drought or plagues brought a poor crop year.

The Bible resolutely declares that all of life stands under God’s control. The one God who created everything rules over the agricultural and fertility realms just as He rules over the political and historical realms.

The Song of Songs declares the independence of God’s people from religion which imprisons love and sexual relationships within the realm of Baal worship or any other false ruler. The sexual acts of the Baal worship constitute neither a ritual of worship nor a sign of love. Instead, the Song of Songs gives new definition to love. Love and sexual union are a God-given privilege for a man and a woman to share. God’s people in the privacy of their existence together, not in the worship place, may participate properly and happily in this dimension of life.

Later traditions of Judaism and Christianity have used allegorical and typological methods of interpretation to extend the meaning of the Song of Songs to God’s love with His people and Christ’s love for the church.

Disciple’s Study Bible Copyright © 1988 Holman Bible Publishers, Nashville, TN. All rights reserved.

Although perhaps confused by this beautiful book let us prayerfully proceed and be blessed.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

ECCLESIASTES

"I know nothing grander in its impassioned survey of mortal pain and pleasure, its estimate of failure and success, none of more noble sadness; no poem working more indomitably for spiritual illumination.”
                                                                                                                         —E. C. Stedman

---MacDonald, William ; Farstad, Arthur: Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New
Testaments. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995

The Apologetics Study Bible succinctly outlines the issues (difficulties) of Ecclesiastes:

Two basic apologetics-related questions arise from the book of Ecclesiastes: first, whether the book was written by Solomon; and second, whether the book is orthodox. Regarding the first question, many scholars consider Ecclesiastes to be a late book, written between 400 and 100 B.C., and therefore obviously not by Solomon who lived in the tenth century B.C. Regarding the second question, many readers are troubled by the book's apparently cynical attitude ("Everything is futile," says 1:2), by its apparent denial of afterlife (e.g., 3:19-20), by its recommendations to eat, drink, and enjoy life (e.g., 5:18; 10:19), and by its seemingly indifferent attitude about morality (e.g., 7:16-17). This second question will be addressed in the notes on Ecclesiastes.

—Apologetics Study Bible, The

The Believer’s Bible Commentary offers a suggestion to deal with the understanding of this book:

Ecclesiastes is one book of the Bible whose uniqueness, at least, has never been questioned, even though nearly everything else about it has been (e.g., its authorship, date, theme, and theology).

The reason this book seems to clash with the rest of the Word of God is that it presents merely human reasoning “under the sun.” This phrase, under the sun, forms the most important single key to understanding Ecclesiastes. The fact that it occurs twenty-nine times indicates the general perspective of the author. His search is confined to this earth. He ransacks the world to solve the riddle of life. And his whole quest is carried on by his own mind, unaided by God.

If this key—under the sun—is not kept constantly in mind, then the book will present mountainous difficulties. It will seem to contradict the rest of Scripture, to set forth strange doctrines, and to advocate a morality that is questionable, to say the least.

But if we remember that Ecclesiastes is a compendium of human, not divine, wisdom, then we will understand why it is that while some of its conclusions are true, some are only half true, and some are not true at all.

MacDonald, William ; Farstad, Arthur: Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995